SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY & SYSTEMS THINKING - Nous-Sapient

Join WhatsApp Group

Join WhatsApp Group

SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY & SYSTEMS THINKING

Claim type clarity

Distinguish normative claims (“ought”) from descriptive claims (“is”), and from instrumental claims (“if you want X, do Y”).

Moral framework explicitness

What ethical theory or principles are being used (even if implicitly)?

Internal coherence

Are principles consistent, non-contradictory, and stable under variation?

Scope & moral jurisdiction

Who is included, excluded, and why (persons, stakeholders, future generations)?

Trade-off handling

How conflicts between values are adjudicated (rights vs welfare, fairness vs efficiency).

Edge cases & stress scenarios

Does reasoning hold under extreme or adversarial conditions?

Hidden assumptions

Background claims about human nature, agency, responsibility, harm, and fairness.

Action-guidance quality

Does the ethics provide usable guidance or only critique?

Proportionality & reasonableness

Are prescriptions realistically actionable without demanding moral heroism?

Misuse potential

How ethical language can be weaponized (shaming, coercion, selective enforcement).

Legitimacy of enforcement

If ethics is translated into rules, who enforces and with what safeguards?

Compatibility with pluralism

How the ethical stance coexists with disagreement in diverse societies/organizations.

Claim type clarity

Distinguish normative claims (“ought”) from descriptive claims (“is”), and from instrumental claims (“if you want X, do Y”).

Moral framework explicitness

What ethical theory or principles are being used (even if implicitly)?

Internal coherence

Are principles consistent, non-contradictory, and stable under variation?

Scope & moral jurisdiction

Who is included, excluded, and why (persons, stakeholders, future generations)?

Trade-off handling

How conflicts between values are adjudicated (rights vs welfare, fairness vs efficiency).

Edge cases & stress scenarios

Does reasoning hold under extreme or adversarial conditions?

Hidden assumptions

Background claims about human nature, agency, responsibility, harm, and fairness.

Action-guidance quality

Does the ethics provide usable guidance or only critique?

Proportionality & reasonableness

Are prescriptions realistically actionable without demanding moral heroism?

Misuse potential

How ethical language can be weaponized (shaming, coercion, selective enforcement).

Legitimacy of enforcement

If ethics is translated into rules, who enforces and with what safeguards?

Compatibility with pluralism

How the ethical stance coexists with disagreement in diverse societies/organizations.

Claim type clarity

Distinguish normative claims (“ought”) from descriptive claims (“is”), and from instrumental claims (“if you want X, do Y”).

Moral framework explicitness

What ethical theory or principles are being used (even if implicitly)?

Internal coherence

Are principles consistent, non-contradictory, and stable under variation?

Scope & moral jurisdiction

Who is included, excluded, and why (persons, stakeholders, future generations)?

Trade-off handling

How conflicts between values are adjudicated (rights vs welfare, fairness vs efficiency).

Edge cases & stress scenarios

Does reasoning hold under extreme or adversarial conditions?

Hidden assumptions

Background claims about human nature, agency, responsibility, harm, and fairness.

Action-guidance quality

Does the ethics provide usable guidance or only critique?

Proportionality & reasonableness

Are prescriptions realistically actionable without demanding moral heroism?

Misuse potential

How ethical language can be weaponized (shaming, coercion, selective enforcement).

Legitimacy of enforcement

If ethics is translated into rules, who enforces and with what safeguards?

Compatibility with pluralism

How the ethical stance coexists with disagreement in diverse societies/organizations.

Claim type clarity

Distinguish normative claims (“ought”) from descriptive claims (“is”), and from instrumental claims (“if you want X, do Y”).

Moral framework explicitness

What ethical theory or principles are being used (even if implicitly)?

Internal coherence

Are principles consistent, non-contradictory, and stable under variation?

Scope & moral jurisdiction

Who is included, excluded, and why (persons, stakeholders, future generations)?

Trade-off handling

How conflicts between values are adjudicated (rights vs welfare, fairness vs efficiency).

Edge cases & stress scenarios

Does reasoning hold under extreme or adversarial conditions?

Hidden assumptions

Background claims about human nature, agency, responsibility, harm, and fairness.

Action-guidance quality

Does the ethics provide usable guidance or only critique?

Proportionality & reasonableness

Are prescriptions realistically actionable without demanding moral heroism?

Misuse potential

How ethical language can be weaponized (shaming, coercion, selective enforcement).

Legitimacy of enforcement

If ethics is translated into rules, who enforces and with what safeguards?

Compatibility with pluralism

How the ethical stance coexists with disagreement in diverse societies/organizations.